Page 27 - SaxoCell Annual Report22/23
P. 27

CAR-         UltraCAR-T
                  T





             The  goal  of  the  UltraCAR-T  project  is  the  development,  clinical  testing  and  economization  of
             innovative  CAR-T  cell  products  for  the  treatment  of  oncological  diseases.  The  focus  is  on  the
             optimization  of  development  and  manufacturing  processes  with  regard  to  production  time  &
             production costs, as well as product quality & product functionality.


             Project management: Michael Hudecek

             Partners: Fraunhofer IZI, T-CURX GmbH

             Prior to the start of the project, the project partner T-CURX had already evaluated a number of
             different  target  antigens  for  the  execution  of  the  project.  Among  other  things,  comprehensive
             going-to-clinic and going-to-market analyses were performed and it was decided to use a target
             antigen in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as the lead target antigen for the UltraCAR-T project. The
             antigen shows an advantageous expression pattern, as it is highly expressed on malignant cells in
             AML and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) CLL on the one hand, and is undetectable or barely
             detectable  in  healthy  tissue  on  the  other  hand.  In  previous  experiments,  T-CURX  had  already
             produced and tested different CAR constructs. The different CARs were expressed in T cells and
             their efficacy against antigen+ AML cell lines was tested. In the course of the UltraCAR-T project,
             confirmatory  experiments  were  performed  with  the  most  promising  CAR  construct.  The  data
             confirm  previous  work  and  demonstrate  the  efficacy  of  CAR-T  cells  against  AML  cell  lines  and
             primary AML blasts.
             Furthermore, the manufacturing time of the CAR-T cells should be significantly reduced. This was
             initially tested using a semi-open, non-automated GMP manufacturing process. For this purpose,
             alternative clinical manufacturing protocols were compared, which differ, among other things, in
             the type of T cell activation and in the process length. The protocols were compared in terms of
             cell  yield,  CAR  expression  level,  functionality  and  gene  expression.  An  SOP  for  a  7-day
             manufacturing process was then developed and tested (see Figure).
             Furthermore, the manufacturing time of the CAR-T cells should be significantly reduced. This was
             initially tested using a semi-open, non-automated GMP manufacturing process. For this purpose,
             alternative clinical manufacturing protocols were compared, which differ, among other things, in
             the type of T cell activation and in the process length.
                                                                                                              22
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32